Developing an outcome-based compensation agreement
A step-by-step outline for constructing a client compensation agreement based on outcomes instead of hours.
The foundation for developing a value-based agency-client relationship is to begin with a Value Audit. The ultimate goal of the Value Audit is to uncover and identify a brand’s chief value drivers, which can be viewed in a multidimensional framework of outcomes:
| Value Indicators | ||
|---|---|---|
| Transactional | Behavioral | Attitudinal |
| Value Influencers | ||
| Agency | Client | |
The following describes each of the elements of the Value Audit and outlines the basic steps in the process.
Identify stakeholders
The first step is to identify the key stakeholders in both organizations who will be involved in establishing the terms and measurements of a value-based relationship. Given the high-level nature of some success measures, it’s critical that the stakeholder group includes C-level executives from both the agency and the client.
| Agency Stakeholders | Client Stakeholders |
|---|---|
|
CEO |
CEO |
|
CFO |
CFO |
|
COO |
COO |
|
Account Director |
CMO |
|
Account Supervisor |
Brand Managers |
|
Account Executives |
Additional key personnel with agency contact |
|
Key function or department heads involved on business |
|
|
Key additional team members involved on business |
|
Understand the client’s profit profile
To begin the Value Audit process, engage the client stakeholders in a discussion of the following key questions:
- How does your brand/company make money?
- What is the profit model for the brand/company?
- Who is the brand’s “best customer”; the one that likely produces most of your sales and virtually all of your profits?
- Based on your profit model, which of our offerings do you most value?
- What specific results do you hope our services will help you achieve?
- How do you measure success today with your agency?
- Ideally, how would you like to measure success?
- If price wasn’t an issue, what role would you like us to play?
Identify Value Indicators
Types of Value Indicators
|
Transactional |
Financial measurements, sales and market share data, etc. |
|
Behavioral |
Actions and behavior of target audiences |
|
Attitudinal |
Attitudes, knowledge, awareness of target audiences |
Value Indicators can also be identified for each of the brand’s key audiences. The most obvious audience is customers, but Value Indicators can also apply to prospective customers, employees, opinion leaders, editors and reporters, or even channel partners.
|
|
Current Customers |
Prospective Customers |
Employees |
Shareholders |
Channel Partners |
|
Transactional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Behavioral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attitudinal |
|
|
|
|
|
The process of identifying and prioritizing Value Indicators is a combination of both art and science. The lack of data in many companies leads some executives to conclude that identifying the right metrics is difficult if not impossible. But the truth is most of the metrics that matter involve a heavy dose of judgment.
Key stakeholders at both the agency and the client can identify and rank the vital brand Value Indicators using a series of simple worksheets. The agency should help facilitate this process by providing a “menu” of possible indicators that are appropriate for the client’s brand and category, then:
- Ask client stakeholders to select no more than seven Value Indicators in each of three areas: Transactional, Behavioral, and Attitudinal.
- Then ask them to then rank these indicators in importance (forced ranking) within each of the three categories.
Note: Agency stakeholders should be asked to do the same thing so that they can be prepared to have an informed discussion with the client and perhaps challenge some of the client’s judgment and assumptions if necessary.
Armed with the completed worksheets, the agency then leads a discussion with key stakeholders from both sides to reach agreement on a few (ideally no more than three) key Value Indicators within each of the three sub-categories of Transactional, Behavioral, and Attitudinal.
Develop the outline for a Value Scorecard
You’re now at a point where you can begin to build a one-page Value Scorecard that includes the agreed-upon Value Indicators. This is the part that requires the client to spend some money, because to make the Value Scorecard concept work means getting a baseline measurment of the Value Indicators.
Data for the Transactional indicators will usually be readily available from company sources, but baseline measurements for most of the Behavioral and Attitudinal indicators will require some secondary or primary research.
|
Transactional Indicators |
Company financial reports
Sales reports |
|
Behavioral Indicators |
Customer databases
Media databases and reporting services |
|
Attitudinal |
Tracking studies Etc. |
Example
| Value Indicators | Benchmark |
|---|---|
| Transactional | |
|
Organic revenue growth |
$750,000,000 |
|
Revenue market share |
14% |
|
Average price per unit |
$269 |
| Behavioral | |
|
Search engine rankings (organic) |
11.00 |
|
Website unique visitors |
2,900,000.00 |
|
Ever tried brand |
23% |
|
Attitudinal |
|
|
Sees brand as "innovative" (scale 1-10) |
7.90 |
|
Brand consideration (scale 1-10) |
7.30 |
|
Willingness to recommend to a friend (scale 1-10) |
5.60 |
Set goals and weighting for Value Indicators
Having determined the benchmark for each of the Value Indicators, the stakeholders then agree on a reasonable goal for each.
In addition, based on the assumption that not all Value Indicators are equally important, each indicator should be assigned a weighting (adding up to 100% for all Value Indicators).
Example
| Value Indicators | Benchmark | Goal | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transactional | |||
|
Organic revenue growth |
$750,000,000 |
$950,000,000 |
5% |
|
Revenue market share |
14% |
17% |
5% |
|
Average price per unit |
$269 |
$299 |
5% |
| Behavioral | |||
|
Search engine rankings (organic) |
11.00 |
2.00 |
10% |
|
Website unique visitors |
2,900,000.00 |
5,000,000.00 |
10% |
|
Ever tried brand |
23% |
35% |
10% |
| Attitudinal | |||
|
Sees brand as "innovative" (scale 1-10) |
7.90 |
8.75 |
20% |
|
Brand consideration (scale 1-10) |
7.30 |
8.50 |
20% |
|
Willingness to recommend to a friend (scale 1-10) |
5.60 |
6.50 |
15% |
| 100% | |||
As part of this discussion, the parties will also agree on a reasonable time period for measuring and evaluating changes in the Value Indicators.
Optional: Identify Value Influencers
If desired, this process may also include and evaluation of the skills and behaviors that are viewed as the most important in creating value in the relationship. These are called Value Influencers, and they can apply both to the agency and the client.
Value Influencers can be completely customized to each relationship, but studies conducted by Ignition on behalf of major trade organizations have identified a number of recurring desired behaviors, including:
| Examples of Agency Value Influencers | Examples of Client Value Influencers |
|---|---|
|
Working with client in collaborative way |
Providing time to allow agency to do its best work |
|
Assigning agency’s top people to work on business |
Identifying desired outcomes |
|
Developing fresh, unexpected creative ideas |
Giving timely and constructive feedback |
|
Providing relevant insight about brand’s customers |
Facilitating good communication |
|
Developing clear, well-supported strategies |
Providing access to information and people |
|
Executing programs that generate brand buzz |
Having well-organized approval system |
|
Providing expert online marketing solutions |
Minimizing revisions and rework |
|
Developing big multi-channel ideas |
Involving senior decision makers |
|
Providing non-traditional marketing solutions |
Breaking down internal silos |
|
Integrating agency teams and functions |
Providing clear, complete direction to agency |
|
Providing proactive ideas that transcend advertising |
Understanding brand’s key success drivers |
|
Adopting systems that result in smooth workflow |
Creating environment of mutual respect |
Value Influencers can be selected using the same two-step worksheet process described for Value Indicators. The client will select the Value Influencers that they believe are important for the agency to deliver, and the agency will do the same for the client. Each party will also be asked to indicate a goal for each of these factors.
In the case of an established agency-client relationship, another worksheet can be used to ask each party to rate the current performance of the other on these factors. This will serve as the benchmark.
Populate the complete Value Scorecard
Armed with clear Value Indicators and Value Influencers, including benchmarks and goals, the next step is to summarize these measures on the Value Scorecard.
Example
| Value Indicators | Benchmark | Goal | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Transactional |
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth |
$750,000,000 |
$950,000,000 |
5% |
|
Revenue market share |
14% |
17% |
5% |
|
Average price per unit |
$269 |
$299 |
5% |
|
Behavioral |
|
|
|
|
Search engine rankings (organic) |
11.00 |
2.00 |
10% |
|
Website unique visitors |
2,900,000.00 |
5,000,000.00 |
10% |
|
Ever tried brand |
23% |
35% |
10% |
|
Attitudinal |
|
|
|
|
Sees brand as "innovative" (scale 1-10) |
7.90 |
8.75 |
20% |
|
Brand consideration (scale 1-10) |
7.30 |
8.50 |
20% |
|
Willingness to recommend to a friend (scale 1-10) |
5.60 |
6.50 |
15% |
|
|
|
|
100% |
| Value Influencers | Benchmark | Goal | Weighting |
|
Agency |
|
|
|
|
Works collaboratively with client |
6.50 |
8.00 |
20% |
|
Develops programs that results in brand buzz |
7.25 |
8.75 |
40% |
|
Recommends solutions that work in multiple channels |
8.00 |
9.00 |
40% |
|
|
|
|
100% |
| Client | |||
|
Gives agency time to do its best work |
6.25 |
8.00 |
50% |
|
Articulates expectations and desired outcomes for assignments |
7.50 |
8.75 |
25% |
|
Minimizes revisions and rework |
8.25 |
9.00 |
25% |
|
|
|
|
100% |
This completes the Value Audit process. Armed with the Value Scorecard, the agency is now in a position to set a value-based price and move forward with the program. The following describes these last steps in the overall process.
Set a Value-Based Price and Value Reserve
The agency’s compensation will be based on its ability to achieve the desired outcomes articulated as Value Indicators and Value Influencers. Based on the perceived value of these outcomes to the client, the agency will set a value-based price for its work. (See Addendum: Factors to Consider When Setting a Value-Based Price).
In order to make this a true value-based agreement, the agency must agree to share in both the rewards and the risks – a potential upside and a potential downside. One effective way to do this is to set aside a portion of its total fee as a “Value Reserve.” Theoretically, this can range anywhere from 1% to 100%. However, the higher the risk, the higher the reward in terms of how the Value Reserve is reconciled at the end of the period.
Calculating the Value Score
At the end of the agreed-upon period, the agency calculates the total Value Score, which consists of the combined measures and their respective weightings. The Value Score is a single “metric of metrics” that serves as the basis for adjustment in the agency’s final compensation.
Example
| Value Indicators | Benchmark | Goal | Actual | % Of Goal | Weighting | Value Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transactional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth |
$750,000,000 |
$950,000,000 |
$837,000,000 |
88% |
5% |
4% |
|
Revenue market share |
14% |
17% |
16% |
94% |
5% |
5% |
|
Average price per unit |
$269 |
$299 |
$285 |
95% |
5% |
5% |
|
Behavioral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search engine rankings (organic) |
11.00 |
2.00 |
3.00 |
150% |
10% |
15% |
|
Website unique visitors |
2,900,000.00 |
5,000,000.00 |
4,700,000.00 |
94% |
10% |
9% |
|
Ever tried brand |
23% |
35% |
34% |
97% |
10% |
10% |
|
Attitudinal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sees brand as "innovative" (scale 1-10) |
7.90 |
8.75 |
8.50 |
97% |
20% |
19% |
|
Brand consideration (scale 1-10) |
7.30 |
8.50 |
8.00 |
94% |
20% |
19% |
|
Willingness to recommend to a friend (scale 1-10) |
5.60 |
6.50 |
6.25 |
96% |
15% |
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
101% |
| Value Influencers | Benchmark | Goal | Actual | % of Goal | Weighting | Value Score |
| Agency | ||||||
|
Works collaboratively with client |
6.50 |
8.00 |
7.75 |
97% |
20% |
19% |
|
Develops programs that results in brand buzz |
7.25 |
8.75 |
8.00 |
91% |
40% |
37% |
|
Recommends solutions that work in multiple channels |
8.00 |
9.00 |
8.55 |
94% |
40% |
38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
94% |
| Client | ||||||
|
Gives agency time to do its best work |
6.25 |
8.00 |
7.00 |
88% |
50% |
44% |
|
Articulates desired outcomes for assignments |
7.50 |
8.75 |
7.75 |
89% |
25% |
22% |
|
Minimizes revisions and rework |
8.25 |
9.00 |
8.50 |
94% |
25% |
24% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
90% |
| Value Score Calculation | ||||||
|
|
Weighting |
Value Score |
Value Score |
|
|
|
|
Value Indicators |
90% |
101% |
91% |
|
|
|
|
Value Influencers – Agency |
5% |
94% |
5% |
|
|
|
|
Value Influencers – Client |
5% |
90% |
-4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91% |
|
|
|
Reconciling the Value Reserve
Based on the Value Score, the Value Reserve is then reconciled. This results in either additional compensation to the agency or a rebate from the agency to the client. The more risk the agency is willing to assume, the greater the potential reward.
This chart shows how a 10% Value Reserve might be reconciled at the end of an agreed-upon period. The percentages can be set in any way agreed to by both parties, and will vary based on the amount of risk taken by the agency. A larger Value Reserve – say 25% -- would mean larger potential returns to the agency.
| Value Score | Percent of Value Reserve retained by the agency at end of period | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Above 100% |
145% |
|
|
95 - 100% |
140% |
|
|
90 - 94% |
135% |
|
|
85 – 89% |
130% |
|
|
80 – 84% |
125% |
|
|
75 – 79% |
120% |
|
|
70 – 74% |
115% |
|
|
65 – 69% |
110% |
|
|
60 – 64% |
105% |
|
Positive |
55 – 59% |
100% |
|
Neutral |
50 – 54% |
95% |
|
Negative |
45 – 49% |
90% |
|
|
40 – 44% |
85% |
|
|
35 – 39% |
80% |
|
|
30 – 34% |
75% |
|
|
25 – 29% |
70% |
|
|
20 – 24% |
65% |
|
|
15 – 19% |
60% |
|
|
10 – 14% |
55% |
|
|
Below 10% |
50% |
Questions or feedback? Contact us.
Copyright © 2011 Ignition Consulting Group, Inc. Terms of Service
